wildlifefisheriesparks
MISSISSIPPI WEB SITE


STEVEN A. McCALEB
103 ALVERADO DRIVE
LONG BEACH, MISSISSIPPI 39560
PHONE & FAX: (228)-868-8428
The below United State Department of Interior bill will show how far Mississippi Legislatures will go to ensure that is misuses the peoples tax dollars.
Since WRANPS was destroyed during the hurricane and it is moving to the Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, & Parks, (MDWFP) it has ensured itself that grant money to WRANPS will not have to stop.
Which means the Secretary of State, will still have the power to misuse the peoples money.
I have sent a request asking the United State Department of Interior to resend this bill in order to save the taxpayers of Mississippi money.
It is sad to see how far our elected officials will go to keep one organization in grant money, but that is the way of Mississippi.
REMEMBER: MONEY, POWER, & PERKS + FRAUD, WASTE, & ABUSE= CORRUPTION IN MISSISSIPPI
So I guess I shouldn't be so surprised when our Legislative Body does stupid things like this.
But what does surprises me is that the Governor of Mississippi, Haley Barbour, allows this type of action to go on during his watch.
The word "grant" tells me why this bill was passed for WRANPS.
This society has been provided untold amounts of taxpayers money and there is no stopping the money from flowing.
Hopefully the Department of Interior will review my request and resend the bill.
It is time for WRANPS to stand alone and not receive grant taxpayers dollars, there are several other wildlife groups in Mississippi but to my knowledge they do not receive grant dollars.
No, WRANPS, has become a political organization in Mississippi, why I do not know, perhaps its a place tax money can be shifted to another project. (bate and switch).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Your message has been received by the
Department of the Interior, National
Business Center Webteam. Thank you for your interest.
I find it so convenient that WRANPS has to move from its present location, and not since it is moving to the MDFWP, on state owned property.
I have request a review for the action WRANPS is doing by now being able to receive grant/tax money from the taxpayers.
Mississippi always looking for a way around the law, like the laws our elected officials make, some we know about and others they don't want you to know about.
Try going to the Mississippi Code of 1972 at www.sos.state.ms.us, and don't be suprised if your computer locks up.
I received a phone call from Jackson (my phone ID said "out of area") and was told the web address to go to the Mississippi Code, luckily I have several defensives and mine did not lock up.
http://www.mdot.state.ms.us/project_studies/pdf/072606/Gulfport_to_Wortham.pdf

| MS | Jackson | Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries & Parks | Dr. Sam Polles | Executive Director | P.O. Box 451 | 39205-0451 | |||
| Mccaleb4thdist | |
|
Third request
How does a non-profit society
get to establish itself on State owned property?
How does this society WRANPS,
able to establish a contract with the State owned MDWFP to
help build there new Wildlife Rehabilitation Society?
There are several other
Wildlife Rehabilitation Centers in Mississippi but it seems
to me that WRANPS is treated special; why is that?
WRANPS has owed me money in
the amount of $7,790.00 since JAN. 1991, and they have not
paid me one penny.
So I believe WRANPS should be
discontinued and no longer in operation.
Please provide me with any and
all documents concerning WRANPS and its contracting with
MDWFP.
Perhaps politics has gotten
WRANPS everything it wants, in that case, I will need the
names, addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses on the
WRANPS Board.
Sincerely,
STEVEN A. McCALEB
Cc: Governor of
Mississippi, Haley Barbour
|
|
MISSISSIPPI’S COMPREHENSIVE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION STRATEGY
This strategy has WRANPS
written all over it!!
CHAPTER 1 : INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE 13
M ississippi's Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy (CWCS) is part of a
nationwide
collaboration of state and federal agencies, non-profit organizations and
individuals to address the
habitat needs of declining wildlife. These state strategies mark the first time
in U.S. history that state
wildlife agencies and the broader conservation community have cooperated to
design a conservation
blueprint for all wildlife species.
This national planning effort is an outgrowth of the efforts led by the Teaming
with Wildlife Coalition.
Since the early 1990s, the 3,000-member nationwide Teaming with Wildlife
Coalition has worked to
secure funding for state fish and wildlife agencies to take preventative actions
keeping rare species from
becoming endangered and common species abundant. In 2001, Congress responded to
this need by
creating the State Wildlife Grants (SWG) program and the related Wildlife
Conservation and
Restoration Program (WCRP). From 2001 - 2005, over $300 million has been
allocated to state wildlife
agencies using a formula based on population and land area.
In order to make the best use of the State Wildlife Grants (SWG) program,
Congress charged each state
and territory with developing a CWCS. The Mississippi Department of Wildlife,
Fisheries and Parks
(MDWFP) is coordinating this effort on behalf of the State of Mississippi. These
strategies will provide
an essential foundation for the future of wildlife conservation and a stimulus
to engage states, federal
agencies and other conservation partners to strategically think about their
individual and coordinated
CHAPTER I:
INTRODUCTION & PURPOSE
MISSISSIPPI’S COMPREHENSIVE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION STRATEGY
CHAPTER 1 : INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE 14
roles in prioritizing conservation efforts in each state and territory.
Congress identified the required elements of this conservation strategy in the
WCRP legislation and the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service adopted those same elements to also apply to SWG
required conservation
plans, so that one document will satisfy both needs. Each state's strategy must
identify and focus on
"species in greatest need of conservation", yet address the "full array of
wildlife" and wildlife-related
issues.
The strategies must provide and make use of the following elements:
1. Information on the distribution and abundance of species of wildlife,
including low and
declining populations as the State fish and wildlife agency deems appropriate,
that are indicative of
the diversity and health of the State's wildlife; and,
2. Descriptions of locations and relative condition of key habitats and
community types essential to
conservation of species identified in (1); and,
3. Descriptions of problems which may adversely affect species identified in (1)
or their habitats, and
priority research and survey efforts needed to identify factors which may assist
in restoration and
improved conservation of these species and habitats; and,
4. Descriptions of conservation actions proposed to conserve the identified
species and habitats and
priorities for implementing such actions; and,
5. Proposed plans for monitoring species identified in (1) and their habitats,
for monitoring the
effectiveness of the conservation actions proposed in (4), and for adapting
these conservation actions
to respond appropriately to new information or changing conditions; and,
6. Descriptions of procedures to review the strategy at intervals not to exceed
ten years; and,
7. Plans for coordinating the development, implementation, review, and revision
of the plan with
Federal, State, and local agencies and Indian tribes that manage significant
land and water areas
within the State or administer programs that significantly affect the
conservation of identified
species and habitats.
8. Congress also affirmed through this legislation that broad public
participation is an essential
element of developing and implementing these plans, the projects that are
carried out while these
plans are developed, and the Species in Greatest Need of Conservation (SGCN)
that Congress has
indicated such programs and projects are intended to emphasize.
In addition to these required elements, the International Association of Fish
and Wildlife Agencies
(IAFWA) provided a set of Guiding Principles for states to consider as they
develop and implement
their strategies (Appendix I). The MDWFP has tried to apply these principles in
the construction of our
CWCS and will continue to use these Guiding Principles as the CWCS evolves over
the next decade.
MISSISSIPPI’S COMPREHENSIVE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION STRATEGY
CHAPTER 1 : INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE 15
Mississippi's share of SWG funding since 2001 has been more than $3.5 million,
which has been used to
help develop this strategy and to fund conservation efforts focused on black
bear restoration, walleye
research and restoration, Partners in Flight coordination, fish and mussel
inventories and many other
conservation and restoration efforts. This document represents the summary of a
conservation planning
effort that officially began in 2003 in response to the congressional mandate,
but which builds upon
many years of research and data accumulation by the staff of the MDWFP through
the Mississippi
Museum of Natural Science (MMNS) and the conservation planning efforts of many
other organizations
and agencies.
Mississippi's CWCS is a blueprint aimed at conserving wild species and their
habitat. The
overarching goal of this planning effort is to provide a guide to effective and
efficient long-term
conservation of Mississippi's biological diversity.
In order to achieve this long-term goal, we embarked on this multi-year, dynamic
process to develop a
conservation strategy as directed by Congress. Our objectives were to base the
CWCS on the best
currently available data on the distribution and abundance of wildlife species
in the state, particularly
rare and declining species which are defined as Mississippi's SGCN. The strategy
assesses the extent and
condition of habitats required by these species, as well as existing and
potential threats and conservation
opportunities for these habitats. Further, this strategy addresses research and
survey needs as well as
monitoring needs, and provides a plan for MDWFP and its partners to review and
revise the CWCS
every ten years. While it builds on the work of previous planning efforts, it
attempts to define a set of
broad conservation strategies that may be applied locally and statewide to
achieve the ultimate goal of
protecting and improving Mississippi's diversity of native species and habitats.
It indicates areas in
which resources should be concentrated and emphasis placed. Where data are
currently lacking to
provide a clear picture of conservation objectives, research priorities are
indicated. Where the data are
sufficient to provide direction for species and habitat protection, restoration
or management, these
recommendations are stated.
Coordination with agencies, organization and corporations that manage land or
administer wildlife
conservation programs in Mississippi was a key component of this effort. Because
this strategy is not an
agency plan, but rather a guide for the entire state, MDWFP invited a broad
cross section of
representatives to serve on its Advisory Committee to help develop and review
this document. A
Technical Committee of MDWFP wildlife, fisheries and museum biologists worked
with an Expert
Team of biologists with expertise on SGCN and their habitats to compile and
synthesize the data for
review and input and coordinated their efforts with the Advisory Committee made
up of a stakeholders.
An internal Steering Committee of agency managers ensured the process followed
congressional
guidelines and met the eight elements required by law.
MISSISSIPPI’S COMPREHENSIVE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION STRATEGY
CHAPTER 1 : INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE 16
This document is not intended to be an outline for land use ordinances or for a
statewide land use plan,
nor is it an evaluation or indictment of land use practices by an entity. Every
activity by humans on the
Mississippi landscape has positive or negative impacts on wildlife and their
habitats. The idea behind
this strategy is to provide information and guidance that may help minimize
negative impacts and
maximize positive impacts. The emphasis of this effort is not on developing new
regulations, but on
more effective implementation of existing regulations and on development of new
partnerships for
conservation in the future.
This CWCS represents a foundation on which our agency and many other partners
hope to build a more
detailed conservation action plan for our state that further defines priority
conservation areas and
combines the efforts and resources of many partners to achieve the overall goal
of improving
biodiversity in Mississippi.

STEVEN A. McCALEB
MY OPINION